In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that smoking in public places is presently prohibited in certain countries. A

number

of individuals say that

such

a rule is reasonable.

This

essay completely agrees with that statement because

this

action reduces the

number

of new smokers and less chances of getting infected by smokers. Out of all the arguments the strongest one to support my side is that the new smokers are less likely to smoke.

This

is to say that they are mostly teenagers and young adults and usually copy other smokers to show the maturity level, but by Banning public smoking, there are fewer chances to get in contact with them and

this

will help to not get addicted to smoking. A typical example of

this

is that according to survey in India, 60% reduction in the

number

of smokers after a ban in public areas. The other reason to prove my point is that the numbers of passive smokers have been drastically reduced and

this

means that fewer people affected by smoking. If smokers do not smoke in public area, the people are not contaminated by the fumes of smoking, which has detrimental effects on our body and cause of dangerous diseases

such

as cancer, Asthma. A typical reference for

this

is that my uncle had passed away because of cancer, even he never smoked a cigarette in his life. To conclude the essay, it can be

finally

commented that smoking in public zone is illegal in numerous countries and I personally believe that

this

rule of government far more valuable for all the citizens of the Nations because it reduces, the

number

of newcomers in smoking habits and the risk of getting affected by active smokers.