Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I mostly disagree with the question statement as I believe that the government should revamp the current public structures like the museums or town halls
instead
of building new ones.
Although
, the common perception of people is that with the growing population and an increase in educational and technological advancement, new public buildings should be constructed, I,
however
think that the cons of
this
outweigh the pros.
First
and foremost, I anticipate that the construction of the new public buildings would be a sheer waste of taxpayer’s money. It would cost a hefty amount to build a structure, buy a new land and place, new artefacts and historical things in it.
Instead
of
this
, far less amount of money could be used to renovate an existing building by installing new technology in it, placing new artefacts, beautifying it and making it a tourist attraction.
This
would eventually help generate profits for the government and would
also
help the local community.
In addition
to the previous point, I firmly believe that revamping an existing building,
for example
a science museum, would give visitors a chance to both experience the old artefacts and old technology as well as the new developments in
this
field.
Similarly
, it would provide the viewers a different opportunity to compare the previous and latest technology. It would
further
help historians develop a contrast and analyse how much has changed over the course of time. Concluding the discussion, I would suggest that the taxpayer’s money should be put to other good uses
instead
of spending a large chunk of it on establishing new public buildings.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • symbolizes
  • evolving
  • aspirations
  • incorporate
  • accessibility
  • catalyst
  • economic development
  • heritage
  • conserves
  • cultural
  • integrity
  • operational inefficiencies
  • sustainably
  • repurpose
  • throwaway culture
  • carbon footprint
  • environmental degradation
  • context-specific
What to do next:
Look at other essays: