Formal examination are a way to get student performance. Many people think that course work and project are important. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Evaluation methods of a student’s performance have always been an area of contention around the world. Many believe that

this

can be done by continual assessment of their assignments and project work.

On the other hand

, people are

also

in favour of formal examination. I believe the latter is a more appropriate option.

This

can be proved by analysing the fact that the homework and projects done at home can be copied and

also

the memory of a student can be tested in a formal test only.

Firstly

, the workbook assignments submitted by the students are not always done by them. A study by the education department of India proved that many parents help their children in the completion of assignments. Not only

this

, the projects are

also

copied in order to submit the same on time.

Thus

, we can say that it is not a reliable method to judge student capabilities.

Secondly

, the examination

that is

taken in education institutes makes students learn the concept and

also

memorise the same that they have studied in their class.

Moreover

, these are conducted in the presence of The invigilator.

Hence

, restricting students to take any external help.

This

shows how much grasping power does an individual have.

Therefore

,

this

can be considered as a more reliable method of testing one’s ability. To conclude, looking at the discussion it is clear that advantages of formal testing outweigh the advantages of testing by assignments and projects. I believe the method should be implied across the globe and it can be predicted that many countries will adopt

this

way of assessment because of its effectiveness.