A zoo has no usful purpose Do yo agree or disagree with the following statement.

The exhibition of wildlife animal’s is a tradition in

this

era. Animals catch and they are kept in cages. While some people think that it is better for the entertainment and education purpose. Other folk believe that it is harmful for them. We will discuss animals in the

zoo

and it’s positive and negative things. On the one hand, the development of

zoo

has several benefits for the current generation. People who find all types of animals, birds, insects in one served area. So people get entertainment and they can see them life style. Add on to

this

some excellent scientists do research and find prominent results. To cite an example the Kankariya

zoo

where people can see African lion.

Although

zoological garden plays an indispensable role in a science way.

Such

as scientist makes vaccine from the animal’s blood. On the negative side of the

zoo

, a freedom of creature’s has left when they are in the vivarium. So some social persons claimed that we destroy the natural chain of environment.

Hence

some time animal dies during cure time.

Additionally

the maintenance cost of vivarium higher than government should to take extra charge on per visitor. Some animals do not settle in another location

.

Accept space

.

To exemplify, lion’s need huge space and natural scenery

.

Accept space

.

Hence

lion feels unsatisfied in the

zoo

. So lion decreases it’s strong energy comparable to forest life style.

This

essay discussed the reasons why

zoo

culture plays effective and less effective role.I partially agree with the writer’s notion that the

zoo

has some merits and demerits.