the significant of studying philosophical anthropology

Philosophical
Anthropology
is the study of the human being from a philosophical point of view. It is a branch of philosophy which is responsible for the study of humanity as a project of being. It constitutes the
question
of the humanity: the being of the human, it is not the
question
alone that makes for the distinctiveness of philosophical
anthropology
, but rather the primacy
that is
given to that
question
[
Accept space
[
I2]. In
this
respect, philosophical
anthropology
appears, not just as one branch of philosophy among others, but as actually bringing with it a distinctive conception of philosophy as fundamentally concerned with the human in a way that comes before anything else.
(
Accept space
(
Benjamin and Malpas 2017:317) Philosophical
anthropology
demonstrates the complexities of human beings and his
[
Accept space
[
I3] behaviours that are extremely difficult to comprehend in an entirely accurate way.
Besides
, according to Edgar Bodenheim
[
Accept space
[
I4],
philosophical
Suggestion
philosophy
is a disciple that has a more objective conception than one of
anthropology
. It studies topics concerning the problems of
man
[
Accept space
[
I5], going beyond the questions of his
first
stage of
life
on the planet. Philosophical
anthropology
is the most fundamental inductive of sciences that focuses on human beings and their
behaviour
.
Also
, philosophical
anthropology
watches human being like a human
[
Accept space
[
I6] camera and listens like a tape recorder to constitute the core elements of human
behaviour
.
(
Accept space
(
Pertti and
Pelto 1978
Accept comma addition
Pelto, 1978
:53
[
Accept space
[
I7]
)
Accept space
)
. Philosophical
anthropology
perceives
man
as a self-contradictory and mysterious, capable of surpassing his natural limits in quest of reality. It studies
man
existence
, his
experience
and his anxieties. Every human individual is a micro-universe of meaning and significance
[
Accept space
[
I8]. The significance of Philosophical
anthropology
It aims at a new understanding of
man
’s essential qualities and potentialities. It aims to accomplish
this
by the development of suitable methods, by a factual illumination of the puzzle in human institutions, and by doubtful research from different branches of sciences. It is an attempt to construct a scientific discipline out of
man
’s traditional effort to understand and release him. It uses
experience
and opinion to understand its surroundings and to develop in the [I9]
world
.[I10] Philosophical
anthropology
looks at the most fundamental questions about human
nature
and human conditions. Taking as its point of understanding the recent scientific understanding of human
nature
, from
anthropology
broadly conceived, it goes on to
question
the effects of these views for constant philosophical questions about human rationality, morality, the possibility of progress, the
existence
of God and the meaning of
life
. Philosophical
anthropology
is significant because it assists us to understand ourselves better. It
also
helps us to understand others better, because through the studies we hope to understand ourselves much better. It is in human
nature
to desire knowledge and understanding.
Besides
, there is no way to know the
man
and his
behaviour
than to understand his
life
. It provides us with the information of where do we
[
Accept space
[
I11] originates from. Equally so, it helps us to meditate on our
nature
as human beings and what is our purpose or rather our relationship with the universe. Indisputably, it highlights
human reality
Suggestion
the human reality
it makes it more practical and meaningful by posing questions that most people take them for granted. It responds to the needs of
man
directly by reflecting on the implications of everyday
experience
and examining our moral convictions.
(
Accept space
(
Rickman H 1985. P31).
Consequently
, it reveals to us the sector of human
life
which is accessible to our individual
experience
. It
also
tries to cover human phenomena. It gives and embraces the complete picture of human
life
by seeking an understanding of
man
’s
life
tendencies.
Besides
, it studies
man
’s natural limitations and deals with
man
’s potentialities, with what he as a free agent makes of himself or is able and ought to make of himself.
Thus
philosophical
anthropology
studies both
Accept comma addition
studies, both
man
Suggestion
men
as a creature and
man
as the creator of cultural values and
man
as seen by a scientific observer and
man
as interpreted by him.
(
Accept space
(
Aussen
a city in western Germany; industrial center of the Ruhr
Essen
and Innenasicht
[
Accept space
[
I12]
)
Accept space
)
Philosophical
anthropology
interprets philosophically the facts that the sciences have discovered concerning the
nature
of
man
and the human condition. It presupposes a developed body of scientific thought. It clarifies the basic qualities that make
man
what he is and distinguishes him from other beings.
This
discipline aims at providing a critical intervention with the concept of human values and its underlying ideological roots towards various conceptions of human
nature
. It aims to take various thematic views on the philosophical perspectives on human
nature
concerning the formation of human values through ancient and modern traditions.
Moreover
, it helps each one of us to become productive members of society by being good people. It instils in us the concept of a good
life
and good
behaviour
around others. It helps us to understand who we are and what our role in the universe is. It gives a meaning of what it means to be a person unlike other social sciences that explains what it is to be a human
person but
Accept comma addition
person, but
does not explain what it means to be a human person. Philosophical
anthropology
reflects upon
man
to understand him in his wholeness, grasping the fundamental principles of his
existence
in the
world
and his
behaviour
.
Hence
, that, whereas science investigates how the human individual manifests himself
toward
Suggestion
to
his environment and his fellow
man
, Philosophical
anthropology
asks itself of human being, about the ultimate principles of their
existence
and activity.
(
Accept space
(
Palumbieri
, S 1999:51-52). It illumines us to see human beings with
different perspective
Suggestion
different perspectives
a different perspective
to respect the
life
that is
within ourselves and in other beings. We need to understand our
world
and the things that we do within it for our cognitive growth but
also
our mental health. If we cannot understand ourselves, how can we understand anything else?
So it
Accept comma addition
So, it
tries to help us to understand ourselves well
[
Accept space
[
I13]. Philosophical
anthropology
divides
human’s
Suggestion
human
civilization in three sentiments
i
refers to the speaker or writer
I
.e. 1). Anthropocentric- explaining
man
as a supreme being and the measure of all things, and
therefore
cannot be any scope wider
this
. 2).
Cosmocentric
, it
explain
Suggestion
explains
man
on the plane of
nature of
Accept comma addition
nature, of
the cosmos;
man
realizes himself only when he behaves according to the laws of
nature
. 3).
Theocentric
, here it explains human being on the plane of God, and
therefore
man
behaves correctly and reaches
full realization
Suggestion
the full realization
of himself if he conforms to the laws of God and takes God himself as his model.
(
Accept space
(
Batista, M p14
[
Accept space
[
I14]
)
Accept space
)
. It explains our ultimate goal as human persons and the mutual relationship between God and
man
. It explains the religious aspect of human being, by telling us about the history of
man
before and after the fall.
Also
, it gives a different perspective of humanity that of salvation history
that is
the history of God’s relationship with humanity
[
Accept space
[
I15]. Philosophical
anthropology according
Accept comma addition
anthropology, according
to Batista
[
Accept space
[
I16] intends to unmask the pretexts of self-sufficiency of scientific knowledge and shows that human reality
poses
move with force, "He pushed the table into a corner"
pushes
the latter case, its objectives are to advance and complete the knowledge of
man
’s
behaviour
, though it is partially developed by the experimental sciences.
(
Accept space
(
Batista M
Accept comma addition
Batista, M
p9). It helps us to fully grasp the longings of human beings, which the human being has been searching without rest since the beginning of their
existence
. In
this
aspect, it is emphasized how at present the human being does not consider it necessary to resort in the search of God to be able to solve his problems, but now he seeks to take care of himself. Emmerich Coreth the Austrian philosopher, opened the
question
of
man
in terms of philosophical
anthropology
, by saying that no other known living creatures ask questions about their
existence
, their essence, or their place and meaning in the
world
: “the only
man
asks questions; he questions everything, even himself, his essence- exceeding the immediacy of what is given, heading to the foundations” (Coreth, 1994:10) it is
thus
in
such
case that philosophical
anthropology
is needed. Now
man
is seen as being responsible for the
world
in which he lives.
Therefore
,
man
now seeks to solve his problems using scientific and technological advances. At present, it is seen how the human being has found the cure of different diseases that were previously mortal. Here we talk about the “scientific
man
".[I17] Conclusion. For these reasons, it is said that philosophical
anthropology
is responsible for the study of
man
from its essence to the indisputable truths of science[I18]

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: