Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks, while others say they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well at school. Discuss both view, and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Tertiary
education
is essential for achieving success in life. Students, who get high band scores, usually get a chance to admit in universities, though older students and having a low-mark in
school
life should
also
be gotten excess into the higher
education
. From my perspective, all types of students both youngest with high-mark and adult students with low-grade must have a right to earn knowledge from universities. On the one hand, pupils who earn standard marks in all his academic life, easily get admission at
university
. The reason is that professors at tertiaries think that since the student has achieved the highest position at
school
, he must have worked hard. Eventually, he will do a better result in higher studies, and cope with the workload and activities-related universities and its teachers.
For example
, in
school
, the top-rated students are disciplined and efficient so that they do their tasks efficiently and listen what their teachers are focusing on.
Therefore
, the dean of tertiary
education
selects those brilliant students who could do excellent results.
Consequently
,
this
selection generates a higher level of citizens, and socioeconomic will be strong for these intellectuals.
On the other hand
, each student has the right to study at the
university
level. It is justifiable to say that if all students get a higher
education
, any nation will develop immediately. For that reason, universities should give chance to age-students as well as pupils who obtain the lowest marks at
school
due to the advancement of a country.
For instance
, in the USA, the renowned universities
such
as Harvard or Yale - provide their admission form for all types of students, but they should have a quality which could be anything whether skilled at sports, art or higher marks gained in the
school
certificate.
As a result
, no one is unemployed when
university
graduates get their certificate from tertiary
education
. In conclusion, it is a controversial issue about whether universities should focus on selecting the top-rated students from intermediate level, or, whether they should select senior learners who did not cut a good figure on the previous exam. In my opinion, both types of students must be selected by the
university
for the socioeconomic growth of society.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • merit-based
  • competitive environment
  • academic standards
  • innovation
  • diversity
  • mature students
  • equitable
  • inclusive admission policies
  • educational disadvantages
  • holistic admission process
  • extracurricular achievements
  • non-traditional students
  • equal opportunities
  • societal progress
What to do next:
Look at other essays: