Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. The ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The
Airline
industry is thriving in these few decades with more service providers compared with in the past. Some
people
contend that planes are superior ways of transport, designed for the higher income group, so normal
people
cannot enjoy the benefits of the prospering
airline
industry. I partly disagree with
this
argument. With more
companies
being established in the world, the
competitions
Fix the agreement mistake
competition
show examples
between corporations
have
Correct subject-verb agreement
has
show examples
actually brought the price of flight tickets down in view of the fact that they want to attract customers by cost-efficient
services
. Normal inhabitants can have opportunities to enjoy cheap flight tickets that they did not have a few decades ago.
For instance
, HK Express, gaining its reputation by offering
low priced
Add a hyphen
low-priced
show examples
, but outstanding
airline
services
, is a very popular
airline
company in Hong Kong. The token can be as cheap as 1500 dollars compared with Cathay Pacific which charges citizens 3000 for the same distance.
As a result
, common
people
can now have more chances to spend their holidays in other countries without paying for expensive tickets.
However
, some
airline
companies
try to earn more by investing more in the business class, which is a superior service for privileged customers.
This
action is actually widening the gap between rich and normal
people
.
For example
,
rich
Correct article usage
a rich
show examples
one can have a bed on the
airline
while
ordinary
Correct article usage
an ordinary
show examples
one can only sit in the captivated economic class with their legs bent uncomfortably. In
this
sense, the development somehow does not benefit the normal but only the rich.
Moreover
, some corporations, even keep raising their price simply for the reason that they only want to provide
services
to prestige customers, building their brand as a
high class
Add a hyphen
high-class
show examples
company.
Consequently
, normal
people
have
less
Correct quantifier usage
fewer
show examples
good
companies
to choose from.
To conclude
, though the advancement of the
airline
industry has brought about some
companies
that only serve rich
people
, normal
people
can
also
benefit from it by having more cost-effective plane
services
compared with 10 years ago.
This
explained
Wrong verb form
explains
show examples
why I partly disagree with the mentioned argument.
Submitted by billychung99 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Provide more specific examples and elaborate further on how the development of air travel has directly impacted both the richest and ordinary people.
coherence cohesion
Ensure a clear and logical flow between paragraphs to enhance the overall coherence of the essay.
task response
Clear argument presented that partially disagrees with the statement
task response
Effective use of examples to support the main points
Topic Vocabulary:
  • accessible
  • democratised
  • low-cost carriers
  • budget airlines
  • globalization
  • international trade
  • luxury experiences
  • affordable flights
  • cultural exchange
  • environmental impact
  • eco-friendly
What to do next:
Look at other essays: