Some people think media should be allowed to publicize information on someone’s private life. Some others believe that media should be regulated in this regard. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answers and relevant examples.

Opinions differ as to whether newspapers hold the right to publicize people’s personal

life

or a strict control should be put upon

such

an action.

This

essay will discuss two opposing ideas.

To begin

with, it is understandable why some people support the

publishment

private details on newspapers. One reason is that some individuals, especially celebrities and political figures, would want to have their name widely known.

Thus

, they would allow newspapers to write articles about their daily healthy routines in order to cultivate interests

from

Suggestion

of

the mass population.

For example

, the publicity of a prominent politician’s

pastimes

Suggestion

pastime

of charity or helping the elderly would significantly boost his credibility among all citizens, especially his supporters.

Likewise

, an article of a musician showing that he

also

regularly spends time on drawing on the weekends would showcase his talents and attract more fans.

On the contrary

, there are valid reasons for newspapers to be controlled on exposing people’s private

life

.

Firstly

, the flaw aspects of individuals should not be shared publicly as it will damage their

images

Suggestion

image

.

For instance

, a news about the love affair

of

Suggestion

with

an actress will cause a massive scandal resulting in a decrease of her reputation.

Similarly

, an extravagant

life

of a royal member when unveiled would bring an abomination to him and the entire royal family.

Moreover

,

uncontrolled publicity

Suggestion

the uncontrolled publicity

of private details means that people’s lives are being illegally invaded and recorded, which may be against their will and certainly violate the law of privacy.

Therefore

, every publisher should be strongly restricted in recording and sharing private lives unless they acquire people’s permission. In conclusion, while some people accept the news coverage of their personal

life

for promoting purposes, others believe publishers should be strictly controlled as non-permitted publicity of private details might rather harm their reputation.