Some people say that rich nations should help poor countries with their basic needs like food and education while others oppose the idea and argue that the poor nation themselves should try to improve their condition. Do you agree with the idea that rich and developed nations should help the poor nations?

In

this

fast-developing

era

a particular geographical region of indefinite boundary (usually serving some special purpose or distinguished by its people or culture or geography)

area

, some countries struggle to meet the educational and health care needs of their people and even fail to provide an adequate welfare for their citizens. While it is suggested for wealthier nations to help them shoulder the burden, I believe that due to adverse consequence of these aids, they must be limited and attributed through proper mediums. Admittedly, from the humanitarian standpoint, not only is a noble charitable act for

developed

Suggestion

developing

countries to help the underdeveloped ones, but it is their moral responsibility to lift poorer nations up and lead them through the path of development.

in

Suggestion

In

the other words, despite the political borders separating the world

to

Suggestion

into

different nations, people are united as human beings and any suffering imposed on a certain community

calls

Suggestion

call

for worldwide attention. Beyond that, the situation might be reversed in the decades to come and even though a country might be thriving nowadays, a series of unpredictable circumstances would endanger the economic state of aforementioned nation.

Therefore once

Accept comma addition

Therefore, once

a provider of foreign aids to other communities, these countries will change to a hopeful

begger

counting of

charitable notion

Suggestion

the charitable notion

of their allies.

By contrast

, opponents of

unlimited international support claim

Suggestion

the unlimited international support claim

that it is not always advisable for both wealthy and poor nations to participate in

this

financial interaction. Statically many of the

under privileged

lacking the rights and advantages of other members of society

underprivileged

countries are ruled by corrupt governments where administrators either allocate the donation to intrusive military funding or embezzle them for their own personal use. Either way, the money is not usually consumed to fight poverty or improvement of people’s lives.

On the other hand

, history has proven that rich countries rarely consider these donations as a charity but as an investment. Once they donate

significant amount

Suggestion

a significant amount

significant amounts

of money to a nation, it is assumed that the right is given to them to exploit that

nation

Suggestion

nation's

resources as a payback. Eventually a modern form of colonialism takes place in the unfortunate countries. In conclusion, while the idea of international

aids to

Accept comma addition

aids, to

under-developed countries has its devoted advocates, I personally believe that

by

Suggestion

in

assessing the consequential risk of colonialism and channeling the money through improper administrators, a more reliable approach must be taken into account.