A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Nowadays, many countries around the world include inhabitants from different cultures and nationalities. While some people argue that

this

decreases the level of

authentecity

undisputed credibility

authenticity

within these countries, others ensure that

this

kind of

variaty

a collection containing a variety of sorts of things

variety

variation

among citizens help countries thrive on different levels

in addition

to making these geographic locations more intriguing to live in. In

this

essay, I will illustrate why the latter argument is more

compatable

able to exist and perform in harmonious or agreeable combination

compatible

with my way of thinking. A prime reason for rapid development in multicultural regions is that people from different backgrounds are exposed to different experiences in life.

Consequently

,

learning curve

Suggestion

the learning curve

for these people will be acquired through shorter amount of time.

Moreover

, these people will be more willing to adopt

this

rapid change because they can evaluate its outcome

first

hand.

For instance

, a recent Cambridge study has concluded that

prefessional

engaged in a profession or engaging in as a profession or means of livelihood

professional

professionals

sport players who have international teammates develop faster than other players who do not get

this

opportunity.

Also

life in

such

cities is prone to be more interesting due to the fact that a person can try new activities more frequently. The reason for

this

is that different cultures have miscellaneous habits in eating, playing, clothing, or even having fun.

For example

, while in London, which is a multinational city, you can try a different kind of food almost everyday without repeating the same

cuisine

the child of your aunt or uncle

cousin

twice for a whole year. In conclusion, while some people might say that homogeneous societies are better for development, I utterly disagree with that argument.

In

Suggestion

On

the contrary, I think that multinational societies are more interesting and can develop more

effeciently

with efficiency; in an efficient manner

efficiently

.