Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Gretha
Thunberg's campaign in favour of
environment
Suggestion
environmental
protection has promoted the idea that each person can contribute to
this
effort. The fact that the ecological crisis is a global issue raises the question of the limits of individual decisions. Can individuals do anything for the environment
?
Accept space
?
This
essay will argue that even though larger organizations represent the most relevant scale, individuals have to take their part
into
Suggestion
in
the fight
agaisnt
in contact with
against
global warming.
First
of all, large companies and governments are the most relevant scale to save the planet. The former can change their way of production into a cleaner
one whereas
Accept comma addition
one, whereas
the latter can regulate. On the one hand, states have a major role to play because of their
coercion
Suggestion
coercive
power.
In addition
, smaller scales of political power must be
involved
Accept comma addition
involved, such
such
as municipality
Suggestion
as a municipality
as municipal
as municipal municipal
.
For example
, Paris has decided to start
forbiding
excluded from use or mention
forbidden
forbidding
the most polluting cars.
On the other hand
, companies which pollutes can decide to stop
producting
bring forth or yield
producing
goods that hurt the planet.
For instance
, Airbus tries to design new planes that
needs
Suggestion
need
less polluting components.
Nonetheless
, individuals are
also
able to make a small difference. In effect, it would be too easy to put on structures the whole responsibility for climate change. Deciding to use less water or taking the train
instead
of the plane should be considered as very effective ways of improving the environment. Producing certain meats
such
as beef requires much water and plants to make animal
grow
to utter or emit low dull rumbling sounds
growl
. As a consequence, reducing one's consumption could be useful to protect our
ressources
available source of wealth; a new or reserve supply that can be drawn upon when needed
resources
. To conclude, I would say that both structures and individuals have to feel concerned about climate change. The democratic system permits us to force these structures changing their point of view.
Finally
, individuals have to understand that they are part of the
structures
Suggestion
structure
they criticize and that they have the power.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental awareness
  • sustainable practices
  • renewable energy
  • carbon footprint
  • waste reduction
  • conservation
  • ecosystem
  • pollution
  • climate change
  • responsibility
  • leadership
  • legislation
  • investment
  • collaboration
  • systemic change
What to do next:
Look at other essays: