Governments should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students rather than supporting professional sports and art performances for the public. Do you agree or disagree?
The
governments'
expenditure in different areas, particularly Suggestion
government
government's
art
and sport
has always been criticized by people. Some argue that the budget should be allocated to promoting these subjects at
schools, while others are in Suggestion
in
favor
of funding them in a way that these activities become more accessible by the public. I am inclined to spend the money in moderation, because promote over another
favour
otherwise
the future of arts and sport
is likely to be jeopardized.
It is vital for governments to sponsor athletes and artists to preserve the popularity of art
and sports among people. To illustrate, performing art
, which can be in terms of concerts, dramas or cinema films, requires a considerable amount of money. If government
does not invest in artists, they ought to raise funds for their activities by increasing the prices of the tickets. Suggestion
the government
As a result
of becoming unaffordable
, fewer people will be eager to watch performances. The case is more or less similar for the professional sports. The earning capacity of the athletes mainly depends on the rewards; therefore
, they must attend competitions to rival their peers to win awards. Such
attendances require financial resources to cover the costs, otherwise
they will be deprived of joining national, let alone international competitions.
Once there is no audience for the art
performances, and no financial resources for joining sport
competitions, the artists and sport
players are urged to abandon their profession. These repercussions are likely to eliminate the need for investments in educating students. In other words
, these two areas are tightly related to each other. In addition
, as the individuals' passion for art
and sport
forms during the early ages of their life, the schools play a crucial role in cultivating these skills, which demonstrates the importance of governmental expenditure on the extracurricular activities at schools.
To conclude, allocating a larger portion of budget to either
schools or the public is likely to have adverse effects on the popularity of arts and sports. not the same one or ones already mentioned or implied
other
That is
to say, governments should reach a balance to be capable of developing these activities in society.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.