It is more important to use the space in cities well than make them look beautiful. To what extent do you agree?

Some people are stating the space of the

city

should be used rather efficiently than aesthetically. From my perspective, each method contains side pluses. A common view presents the

city

as a technical object, for whom project management should be based only on the theory of

superefficient

exploitation. That’s a reasonable argument, as

modern

Suggestion

a modern city

city

strongly depends on its economical factor and deficient building strategy leads to the losses of income.

Moreover

, a

city

with a lack of investment resources and a future payback because of several unprofitable districts has a chance to disintegrate. So, the land improvement correlated with financial plan is truly significant to overcome problems with bankruptcy. A clear

example may

Accept comma addition

example, may

be nearly opened Gazprom Arena at Nizhniy Novgorod, in Russia, which brought the massive cash flow by football in

this

city

. To intensify, the area around the arena was

also

used for cafes, restaurants and other places accumulating additional income.

Therefore

, not only the financial status

raised but

Accept comma addition

raised, but

the attraction for the foreign investors, which became

ensured

covered by insurance

insured

in the proficiency of Nizhniy Novgorod.

On the other hand

, people are holding the view, that a

city

remains an object of arts. By

this

thought, the

aesthetical

Suggestion

aesthetic

concept should formulate the final project of design in the

city

. It is a clear fact that the majority of capital cities are historically rooted

by

Suggestion

in

centuries,

thus

a combination of traditional and modern building styles can be crucial.

Furthermore

, if

minimalistic

skyscrapers will be replaced by a huge amount of Walmarts and Amazon

Fulfillment

Suggestion

Fulfilment

centers

Suggestion

Centers

, that cannot be goodly mixed with churches and castles. Another huge disadvantage of modern buildings is that it’s mostly developed by businesses, not historical scientists that know the common national style. Recapitulating, the modern

city

cannot be built without income tactics and strategy.

However

, the beauty is needed by native

citizens not

Accept comma addition

citizens, not

to relocate. I think the district's variety can be a solution to use them partly as economically efficient and the other culturally sufficient.