In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?

#places #homes #space #countryside #people

It is an undeniable fact that the need of homes is multiplying day by day and the percentage of people searching for vacant lands to build houses is

also

rising at an alarming rate. The open lands are gradually diminishing in the cities, and the only option left for the majority of the population is the countryside. While some people believe that areas in the villages must be untouched and protected, I strongly opine that people should start living in the rural localities.

First

of all, people should realize that building their homes in villages will not only help in the development of their locality, but

also

brings peace to them.

Moreover

, houses can be constructed spaciously and at a cheaper price than compared to that of cities. To exemplify,

instead

of planning for a congested home in a city, I would prefer a villa in the backwoods, which gives me a greater sense of satisfaction in life.

Secondly

, citizens should be aware of the fact that provinces are called as the backbone of the country.

Although

, youth is moving from towns to metros for employment and business opportunities, they must have the intention to invest their earnings in their home town and

thus

contribute to the rural evolution. To illustrate from my personal experience, one of my friends who works for a corporate company, has built his 3 bedroom dwelling in a spacious layout in the farmland and enjoying a quality life and

also

contributing to the progress by paying taxes to the local authorities.

However

, some people argue that buying an apartment in advanced cities is always a better option for various reasons and constructing new homes must be prevented and

also

debate that the cow country must be protected. To conclude, I fervently believe, and reiterate that, people should start looking at the countryside options to construct their residences rather than competing to have one within the city limits, as there is a much scope for progression in the rural locality these days.

Submitted by murthy.balantrapu on Fri Oct 18 2019

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

8Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Grammar mistakes
 

5 paragraphs

336 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 9.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 9.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 5.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

Topic Vocabulary:

Urbanization
Ecological benefits
Biodiversity conservation
Carbon sequestration
Sustainable development
Eco-friendly building materials
Green architecture
Government policies
Urban sprawl
Infrastructure
Smart planning
Agricultural lands
Rural areas
Population growth
Environmental sensitivity

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

5.5
band
In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish. They cause water and land pollution, and so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The idea that, whether or not plastic bags ought to be banned as they are responsible for different kinds of pollution, remains a source of controversy. I completely agree with the fact that bags that are made out of plastic should be banned.
5.5
band
"Some people believe that the best way to reduce traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transportation. Others, however, think that other measures are needed. Discuss both views and give your own opinion."
Traffic congestion has become a ubiquitous challenge in urban areas, leading to increased commute times and environmental concerns. As urban populations continue to grow, the search for effective solutions intensifies. One school of thought asserts that providing free public transportation is the key to alleviating congestion, while an opposing viewpoint argues for alternative measures. In this essay, we will explore both perspectives, examining the advantages of free public transportation as well as the feasibility of alternative approaches. Ultimately, the goal is to weigh the merits of each stance and offer a comprehensive view on the most viable strategies to address the ever-growing issue of traffic congestion in our cities.
6
band
Governments Should Prioritize Investment in Railways Over Roads
The allocation of government funds is a critical decision that shapes the infrastructure and transportation systems of a nation. While both railways and roads are essential components of a well-functioning transportation network, this essay argues that governments should prioritize spending on railways over roads. By investing in railways, governments can achieve numerous benefits such as improved efficiency, reduced congestion, environmental sustainability, and enhanced connectivity.
5
band
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do youagree or disagree with this opinion?
It cannot be denied that junk food becomes more popular, therefore causing various diseases. While some people consider that a higher fee should be imposed, others suggest that it will not have a significant role in reducing the consumption of fast meal. This essay will look at both views and explain why I think there are major drawbacks in the light of implementing this law.
4
band
You recently read an article in the newspaper about someone whom you know personally but have not heard from in a long time. You found that some of the information published was incorrect. Write a letter to editor to inform him about it. In your letter, ● state what the article is about ● mention the error(s) ● describe what you expect from the editor You do NOT need to write any address. Begin your letter as follows: Dear .....................,.
My name is Ali , a reader of your article in British newspaper. Yesterday I noticed that you wrote about the singer Mikey who I have been knowing him personally since we was together at musical coral,So most of your information was incorrect leading me to disappointment and frustrated then I write this letter to elaborate the mistake you have written.

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this?

Fully explain your ideas

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish. They cause water and land pollution, and so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

"Some people believe that the best way to reduce traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transportation. Others, however, think that other measures are needed. Discuss both views and give your own opinion."

Governments Should Prioritize Investment in Railways Over Roads

In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do youagree or disagree with this opinion?