In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Few individuals in a number of countries are of the school of thought that it is obligatory to spend a huge financial
sum
on building railroads for rapid train movement across cities while others hold a different opinion, believing it is best to enhance an already existing
transport
system
with huge finances. In my opinion, large financial
sum
should be spent on constructing
railway
lines as
this
is the medium through which heavy duty luggage, diesel, fuel and gas are transported, as already existing public
transport
system
can be maintained periodically. The financial quota for construction of a
railway
line should be a huge
sum
.
This
is because, the passage for trains needs to be constructed to standards, as trains are the major means of transporting heavy industrial parts, swiftly across cities, goods which cannot be transported via roads or by air due to their enormous weight. Asides that, the number of people on board in a train at a particular time is a tonne, the weight of both goods and humans are projected onto the rai
ltrack.
Suggestion
rail track
Thus
, large financial
sum
, expertise and standard building materials are of utmost importance when considering the
railway
construction. Spending huge
sum
of money to enhance an already existing means of public transportation can be considered as wastage and improper financial spending. Though, it’s of the utmost importance of service and improve transportation
system
, the cost allocation should not be outrageous, because basic maintenance is all
that is
required to avoid accidents.
For instance
, the cost of improving a federal government road is less than a fraction of the
sum
required to build a road, which is far more cost protective in comparison to birthing a
railway
. In view of
this
, large allocations are unnecessary for maintenance of an existing
transport
system
. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that huge financial sums should be allocated to
railway
construction rather than improving already existing
transport
system
which requires lesser finances. .
Submitted by Dammy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: