More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?

Immigration has always been a popular event amidst the human race for a long time,

this

is often informed by various reasons which differ from different individuals. Recently, a higher number of professionals

are migrating

Suggestion

have migrated

from

under developed

relating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply

underdeveloped

or developing countries to more developed ones. Some people consider

this

as only normal and natural while others think

such

migration is tantamount to stealing resources from the undeveloped countries. In

this

essay I would be writing to disagree with the school of thought which says movement of people to developed countries connotes stealing from the poor countries.

Firstly

, many of the

under developed

relating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply

underdeveloped

countries are faced with serious issues of

unemoplyment

the state of being unemployed or not having a job

unemployment

and under

empolyment

the state of being employed or having a job

employment

. With statistics made available by research, a larger percentage of university graduates in these countries end of being jobless up to 5 years after graduation. They are

therefore

reduced to roaming the streets

seacrhing

diligent and thorough in inquiry or investigation

searching

endlessly for jobs which are actually not available. Others who are lucky to get a job are either underpaid, or doing something completely unrelated to their field of study since that was all their country to offer.

Also

, due to continuous growth of technology, countries who have breakthrough technologically would require individuals from parts of the world to

partcipate

share in something

participate

in the movement if the technological evolution must indeed go round. All major companies would need on their team, people from different races and backgrounds in

other

(often plural) a command given by a superior (e.g., a military or law enforcement officer) that must be obeyed

order

to understand and effectively handle problems with high level of precision. The professional immigrants would be able to bring their

first

-hand

experince

the accumulation of knowledge or skill that results from direct participation in events or activities

experience

experiences

face-to-face with technology to

profer

present for acceptance or rejection

proffer

a lasting solution

which

Suggestion

Which

in the long run is in the benefit of the said poor countries. Conclusively, developing countries should not stand in a pitiable position of feeling being stolen from through immigration rather, they should come to terms with it as movement is one of the characteristics of humans and

most importantly

Suggestion

most important

more importantly

, immigrants are not often coerced,

instead

they do so out

ot

away from home

out

at

of

their

in or at that place

there

our

voalition

the capability of conscious choice and decision and intention

volition

coalition

evolution

.