It is argued that in the 21st century wild species
such
as lion, tiger, elephant, and monkey don not have any place and keeping them is a waste of resources Linking Words
such
as money, land and time. Linking Words
This
essay totally disagrees with Linking Words
this
statement because killing naturals habitats will create a discrepancy on the environmental chain and they can be used for the benefits of humans.
Nature has its own chain and killing its animal might destroy the balance of it. To keep our environment in a good living Linking Words
condition we
need to have wild animals in their places Accept comma addition
condition, we
such
as Linking Words
forest
. Destroying Suggestion
forests
a forest
forest
to make more land will create an imbalance in the environment and all these animals will come to our living places. Suggestion
forests
Moreover
, hunting them to show bravery will create a future shortage of Linking Words
this
species and our Linking Words
next
generation may see them Linking Words
on
photos or in the museum. Suggestion
in
For example
, we could take Dianosour, we can only see its fossil in the museum, photos or in a movie. Humans and wild animal can live together as they have been living Linking Words
from
the beginning of the human era.
Another reason why Suggestion
since
this
essay disagrees with Linking Words
this
statement is that humans have been using wild animals for their advantages. Whenever human needs to do some research, they take wild species to test. Linking Words
For instance
, we could take the monkey Lyca who was the Linking Words
first
life to send in the space when human were not sure about the outer space environment. Linking Words
Furthermore
, researchers are using monkeys, Rabbits to achieve a serum for HIV and cancer. It is essential to have wild creatures for human’s benefits.
In conclusion, it is not a waste of resources to protect wild animals in the modern 21st century. It brings the balance in nature and it is beneficial for human.Linking Words