Some people think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. Do you agree or disagree? Include relevant examples from your own.

In the opinion of some individuals, the most effective way to drive employees to perform more diligently in their work is to base their remuneration on what they produce and sell. I am not totally bias about

this

Linking Words

view.

For instance

Linking Words

, if an organisation decides to increase the salary or wages of each staff by 20% if each one of them can work three extra hours daily

then

Linking Words

the staff will be motivated to work harder for those extra hours.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, it is the factors which stir our ins

trinsic am

belonging to a thing by its very nature

intrinsic

bitions which truly motivate us,

such

Linking Words

as increased autonomy, acquiring new skills, access to self development, being able to express oneself, field trainings, vacations sponsored by the organisation, sense of belonging, job security, timely payment of remuneration and so on.

Additionally

Linking Words

, working in a conducive and comfortable environment

also

Linking Words

go a long way in initiating higher productivity and performance. Someone who works to the point of exhaustion every day in a dilapidated office building, surrounded by people who resent him and reports to a manager that does not show any form of appreciation, will find it difficult to perform exceptionally well. To conclude, remuneration paid in accordance with the amount a wor

ker produesor se

Accept comma addition

worker, producer

worker producer

lls, is more of a sub-motivator than a prime mover.