In many places, new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe ing it is more important do protect the countryside and not build new homes there what is your opinion about this ?

Quite a number of places need construction of new home building and the only vacant areas are in the rural areas. Some individuals feel it is crucial to protect these countryside and not to have new houses there. In my opinion, I agree with

this

notion as building new homes will lead to overpopulation and

also

increase the crime rate in

this

area

.

First

of all, the life expectancy of people in the rural areas is high because the population is less and

this

needs to be protected. Building a new house with

this

available space will lead to the influx of people to the

area

thereby increasing their population. Overpopulation leads to environmental and health problems that will ultimately decrease their life expectancy.

For example

, the suburb

area

of Chicago

that is

known for the longevity of its inhabitant, is now experiencing a 5% reduction in their life expectancy since the local government approved the use of the 100 hectares of land for home construction.

Additionally

, the crime rate of these areas is likely to go up with the new buildings. Nationally, most country sides have the lowest number of criminals and to keep it

this

way it is essential not to allow

this

free space to be used for new homes. The more people in a community the higher the crime rate.

For instance

, a suburb

area

called Buckhead in Norway, which is the safest place in the world for several years, is no longer the safest since the construction of 2,000 new homes for the retirees. To conclude,

although

there is a need for building new homes in most places, it is vital not to use the available space in the countryside as

this

will eventually cause health and economic issue in their areas that pride themselves on those valves.