Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on the arts. Do you agree or disagree?

The role of the arts in modern life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards,

such

as relief from stress. Despite these benefits, the arts have been taken as luxury goods in many cases. It is suggested that public money of a

city

should be concentrated in projects like public facilities, which are more likely to bring immediate benefits to the public, rather than the arts. There are a number of facts indicating that

this

position is right. Public facilities, widely accepted as

one

of the main precursors of a

city

's development, should be

one

of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities

in particular

, should direct sufficient funding toward public facilities. While municipal office buildings, courthouses and post offices are essential components of public services, libraries, hospitals, parks, playing fields, gymnasiums and swimming pools are available to the public for social, educational, athletic and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are more capable to satisfy the needs of citizens and improve their standard of living.

In addition

to social benefits, there are economic merits that public facilities can offer to communities. An integrated transport network (maritime, land and inland waterway transport and civil aviation), example, promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a

city

. Industrial products, as well as agricultural produce of a

city

, can be delivered to other cities in exchange for steady income. Of equal importance are public Internet facilities. Providing access to information by improving Internet and other telecommunications facilities have relevance to the ease with which businesses in a

city

receive, process, utilises, and send information. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs, either from home or abroad, will

first

examine the infrastructure of a

city

before deciding whether to pursue business opportunities there. The arts,

by comparison

,

although

enabling people to see the world and the human condition differently and to see a truth

one

might ignore before, do not merit government spending. The

first

refers to music, film and literature altogether-are more likely to attract the investment of the private sector than public facilities. Businesspeople continue to invest in the arts in the expectation of earning lump sum income and the arts in return, continue to flourish without the government spending. Meanwhile, the arts are a key component of a culture and naturally passed down from

one

generation to another. Unlike public facilities, they require no money to survive. It is

therefore

clear that construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration. The concern about the well-being of individual citizens and that, of a

city

is more acute than the apprehension about the survival and prospects of the arts, something that businesses have a stake in.