In some societies the number of crime committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crime should receive adult punishment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The

punisment

the act of punishing

punishment

of a

crime

should depend on some factors. Those factors can be specified as the

crime

itself, and the age of the criminal.

First

of all, the punishment would help to prevent a teenager from committing the

crime

. Punishment would make a kind of fear of the result of an action; as a matter of

fact if

Accept comma addition

fact, if

teenager knew about the ultimate result of the

crime

they would forbid themselves to act like a criminal.

For example

, In Iran, if people kill someone while driving without the driving license, the highest penalty considered for them and

as a result

of that the young people under 18 which do not have driving license are not allowed to drive and are strongly controlled by their parents because the fear of punishment exists in families.

Secondly

, in my opinion, the age does not make sense in the embarrassing figure of the

crime

. It means

crime

is a

crime

and when someone committed that, no regret would be acceptable especially about major crimes.

For Instance

, when a murder takes place the victim would never have the chance of being alive anymore and in that case,

law

Suggestion

the law

should not be soft on

crime

despite how old the murderer was. In conclusion, juvenile

crime

is unexpectedly rising and some citizens argue that

teenager

Suggestion

teenagers

should be punished

as

Suggestion

at

the same as adults. As I debate two reasons which are mentioned

above I

Accept comma addition

above, I

totally believe that,

this

opinion might positively work.