Some people think that to learn a second language well it is necessary to live in a country where the language is being spoken. What is your opinion about this?

Language

is something we start learning from the lap of our mother. Some people believe, to learn any

language

properly, one must live in the

country

where that

language

is being spoken either as official or as

native

Suggestion

a native language

language

. We are going to discuss, why I agree with the statement while analysing the

oposite

being directly across from each other; facing

opposite

opinions as well.

Language

is not a

subject

, it is a process. Most of the languages have been evolved over centuries, not years or decades. Every

language

has

it`s

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

own norms, accent and pronunciation. There are rules and

grammer

the branch of linguistics that deals with syntax and morphology (and sometimes also deals with semantics)

grammar

grammars

critereas

, which

can not

can not

cannot

be taught using books or courses. Let`s consider French as an example, it looks similar to

english

an Indo-European language belonging to the West Germanic branch; the official language of Britain and the United States and most of the commonwealth countries

English

in scripts, as both languages share many alphabets, even words, but these languages are entirely opposite to each other. Sometimes, we understand the meaning of a particular word, but native speakers use it in different context.

Such

rules of

grammer

the branch of linguistics that deals with syntax and morphology (and sometimes also deals with semantics)

grammar

and usage of words can only be mastered, if you live among the native speakers. Being bilingual is an

additive

Suggestion

added

advantage

to

Suggestion

for

of

anyone`s career or even

personel

concerning or affecting a particular person or his or her private life and personality

personal

development, and there are many people who believe that, learning any

language

is possible without even living in

it`s

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

country

of origin. They consider

language

as a

subject

, and according to them, it is possible to be a professional in any

subject

, as well as

language

. A chemist is never born as a chemist, a mathematician doesn`t learn math in his mother`s lap, they all learn and become professional in their

life time

the period during which something is functional (as between birth and death)

lifetime

,

hence

similar path can be adopted for

language

skills. They

further

support their argument with examples of people, who have never been in a

country

but can speak

it`s

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

language

proficiently. I think,

language

is not an open

subject

, it is usually an honour or pride of a

country

or tribe,

thus

no one can speak or understand it better than a native speaker. We do not

need acedamic

Accept comma addition

need, academic

need academic

researches to establish

this

fact. So, in my

opinion one

Accept comma addition

opinion, one

must communicate with native speakers to learn a

language

better, and what could be better than living among them.