In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although
, there is no doubt that public transport is essential for both government and citizens, it is important to consider the cost spending requirements. Some people believe that money should be spent on enhancement of the current transportation system, I support the view that time effective rail conveyance is mandatory. On one hand, those who advocate to maintain old railways might argue that the fortune should be allocated to more sensitive necessities.
This
is because the primary facilities in rural areas are not adequate to comprehend basic needs of villagers.
For example
, if government prioritize countryside infrastructure development,
such
basic necessaries like educational institutes, hospitals and housing, which are more vital concerns, the quality of life would be improved.
In contrast
, new establishments of railway line would be costlier and the older equipment would become junk and
as a result
, officials might face to take few huge money losses into accounts.
On the other hand
, I would argue that the faster inter-connectivity is vital. The reason is more productivity, which is paramount for evolution, and saved time could be tuned into work efficiency and higher output.
For instance
, the newer high-speed rails can reach up-to 150km speed and helps to save almost 50% of the previous commute time. If,
instead
, expenses turned towards improvement of existing railways, the maintenance cost of old technology would be much higher and as an outcome, it will be unjust as excessive expenditure of taxpayers. In conclusion, though diverting funds into improving existing transits might be requisite and fair to some, in my view, rapid transitions for rails are predominant to reach new avenues.
Submitted by maxxled01 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: