Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is a fierce debate about

government

expenditure on art projects. Some firmly believe it is just a huge waste of money especially when there are so many practical problems. In my view, I support

this

statement to some extent,

however

, art is

also

an indispensable part of the society that should be valued. Surely, considering the finite and limited

government

funding, there are a variety of urgent issues

such

as environmental contamination, economic development, and social welfare that

require

Suggestion

requires

investment. Compared to those issues, art investment is never the top priority that the

government

should be concerned with.

In addition

, if the

government

spent less money on arts,

then

they would be able to help solve those urgent problems and

further

conform to the interests of the majority.

However

,

although

arts project is not the

first

place should be dealing with, it does not mean that the expenditure on

arts

Suggestion

the arts

is unnecessary. As far as I concerned, the

government

is still responsible for devoting to

such

a project on account of cultivating the public’s perception of pursuing beauty.

For example

, the national gallery and opera house are the places where can expand people’s capacity of the mind to be more creative and innovative.

Moreover

, even if arts not directly connecting with the surrounding or survival conditions of people, it

also

plays an important role in their spiritual life. In conclusion,

although

there are several more urgent issues that need to be funded, the politicians should still take account of the arts in expenditure. The ground for saying

this

is that

arts

Suggestion

the arts

provide spiritual support for individuals so that funding arts is not squandering money.