By punishing murderers with the death penalty, the society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Capital

punishment

is a very controversial issue. Some people are of the opinion that by enforcing the

death

penalty

on murderers, the society is

also

guilty of the crime and

life

imprisonment is a better

punishment

.

This

essay will discuss in detail why

life

imprisonment is a better alternative to the

death

penalty

. The

right

to

life

is one of the most fundamental human rights and capital

punishment

violates

this

right

. Abolitionist of the

death

penalty

argue

Suggestion

argues

that capital

punishment

is barbaric and violates

this

right

and

therefore

life

in prison is a better alternative.

For example

, most

first

world countries like Franca and the UK have abolished capital

punishment

for murder.

Moreover

, the

death

penalty

lacks the deterrent effect it is meant to achieve. Dead offenders cannot be remorseful or acknowledge their mistakes.

Furthermore

, abolitionist claim that capital

punishment

has a racial bias. They

are argue

Suggestion

argue

are arguing

that a white American,

for instance

, is likely to support capital

punishment

if the offender is an African-American. It is understandable that some people would support the

death

penalty

as they may have suffered the loss of a loved one from the hands of a murderer.

However

, the society cannot claim to be fair and just if it allows emotions of anger be the sole reason for committing a crime it accuses an offender of. To conclude, the

right

punishment

for murder would continue to be a controversy.

However

, considering that there are better ways of punishing offenders, capital

punishment

should be abolished as it violates the

right

to

life

and is inhuman.