It is unquestionable that rising unemployment is one of the most pressing issues in the industrial world. One solution that has been put forward is to cut the working week to a maximum of 35 hours.
However
, in my Linking Words
view
Accept comma addition
view, this
this
solution is rather controversial and other solutions need to be found.
It is fairly easy to understand the reasons why Linking Words
this
proposal has been made. The reasoning is that if workers are not allowed to work for more than 35 hours weekly, Linking Words
then
employers will be forced to engage more staff. There would be at least two advantages to Linking Words
this
. Not only would unemployment be reduced, but the working conditions of employees on very long shifts would Linking Words
also
be significantly improved. Linking Words
For example
, a factory employing 300 manual workers doing 10 hours a day might employ 450 workers.
There is Linking Words
also
, Linking Words
however
, a strong argument not to implement Linking Words
this
proposal. Linking Words
This
argument is based on economic competitiveness. If a company was forced to employ more workers to produce the same amount of goods, Linking Words
Linking Words
then
its wage bill would rise and its products might become more expensive and less competitive compared to companies with longer working weeks. In conjunction used in comparatives
than
this
case, it is possible that the company either might become insolvent or it would have to make some employees redundant. Linking Words
As a result
, the intended benefit Linking Words
to
the personnel would not happen.
In summary, we can see that Suggestion
of
this
is clearly a complex issue as there are significant advantages and disadvantages to the proposal. My own personal view is that it would be better not to introduce the shortened Linking Words
working
week because it works only in theory and not in practice.Suggestion
work