Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

One of the most heated debates of the

last

few decades has been the extent to which humans should allow animal experiments or avoid it due to

ethical reason

Suggestion

ethical reasons

. It is usually argued that testing on animals is an inhumane crime, while the others believe that

this

kind of experiment can contribute to the development of humankind.

This

essay agrees that animal testing should be eliminated because it causes more

damages

Suggestion

damage

than being useful for

humane society

Suggestion

the humane society

a humane society

humane societies

. Those who support animal

test

Suggestion

testing

claim that because scientists cannot

perfom

carry out or perform an action

perform

experiment

Suggestion

experiments

on a human being, using non-human animals in laboratories are the only method that can give the most accurate result to develop medical treatments or check the safety of other products

such

as cosmetics or detergent. According to USA National Academy of Science, the interactions between a living organism and the environment or the chemicals are so complicated that it cannot be simulated by even the most sophisticated computer model on earth.

Furthermore

, since most of the animals which are used in the laboratories

such

as rats,

mices

any of numerous small rodents typically resembling diminutive rats having pointed snouts and small ears on elongated bodies with slender usually hairless tails

mice

, fishes or

sheeps

woolly usually horned ruminant mammal related to the goat

sheep

ships

lack intelligence, many people believe that their lives are worth less than the life of a human and

thus

it is permissible to harm

them to

Accept comma addition

them, to

ensure the future of mankind, especially in the case of finding a cure to treat deadly diseases

such

as Ebola or HIV. Meanwhile, opponents of animal experimentation – sometimes called animal rights activists – argue that since animals used in experiments are usually exposed to cruel procedures which cause extreme pain and suffering

such

as force feeding, forced injection or food and water deprivation,

this

kind of experimental research is considered to be immoral.

Newest

Suggestion

Newer

research has

proved

Suggestion

proven

that animals have the same capacity as humans to feel pain and experience distress when being harmed and killed,

therefore

people do not have right to cause suffering and death to other species.

Moreover

, animal tests are really expensive and do not give reliable results in

some

one or some or every or all without specification

any

occasions.

For example

, some medical reports in

1950s

Suggestion

the 1950s

showed that sleeping pills had caused serious side-effect on pregnant women and their babies, despite having tested on animals prior to its commercial release and costed the US government more than $10 billion. It must be said that recent technological breakthroughs have introduced many alternative testing

method

Suggestion

methods

that can replace animals in laboratories

such

as artificial human skin or virtual cells which are cheaper and potentially more efficient than animal experimentation. For

this

reason, I believe that humankind should stop

this

animal cruelty and figure out better method to test products or find life-saving treatments. In conclusion, while there are convincing arguments on both sides of the debate, it cannot be denied that even though animal experiments still give some benefits to humane society, its unethical approach and unstable prediction of

effect

Suggestion

effects

on humans outweigh its plausible advantages.

Consequently

, animal testing should be replaced by better practices in the future.