Some people prefer to donate native communities or directly
underprivileged people, whereas other people do
in bigger scales. Basically, each
owns benefits aims for a better society, but the latter
is more outstanding than the former ones.
The local
is a good
that source of
is quantitatively limited immediately impacts the people received help. Canteen,
, which provides non-charged food just supplies for a certain amount of food and for a certain number of people per day. Citizens directly provide help to their local charitable organizations, but there is always restricted in a number of citizens who are willing to give away.
, the amount of local giving is not abundant all the time, so that
is a minus point of
.
, because of the direct giving, the residents can receive immediately the help without long time to wait that means
timely satisfies the needs of the miserable people, while the larger-scale organizations have to contemplate before giving helping decisions. Ultimately, the local
just provides small-scale and instable solutions.
, national or international organizations are the optimal measures can solve big issues: national dilemma and global headache with plentiful
that the local
cannot afford. UNICEF,
, appeal people to
financially in order to conduct its necessary measures. The financial source of these organizations comes from all corners of the world, so it apparently is larger than the budget of local charitable entities.
, the national and international organizations concentrate on problems which are necessary to handle, affect the economic development of the world.
, supporting for these organizations can solve the global emergency crisis that the local
cannot carry, brings positive effect to everyone on the world. Fundamentally,
measure can work on difficult dilemma at a lower financial pressure.
In conclusion, the local
can give local solutions, but its financial supply is fluctuated; the larger scales of
not only have sufficient budget, but
resolve the national or international issues. Apparently, the national or international
is still better than the other, because it can solve the global problems in sustainable financial
.
, people should donate within their ability to improve the society.
In conclusion, the local
can give local solutions, but its financial
is fluctuated; the larger scales of
not only have sufficient budget, but
resolve the national or international issues. Apparently, the national or international
is still better than the other, because it can solve the global problems in sustainable financial
.
, people should donate within their ability to improve the society.