In order to improve a country’s education system, high school students should be encouraged to publicly critique their teachers online. Do you agree with this? What are some other ways high school education could be improved?

Arguments over how to improve a country’s

education

system have been going on for a very long time. Often different strategies work f

or

Suggestion

in

different countries.

However

, allowing high

school

students to openly critique their instructors online is a s

trat-

take the first step or steps in carrying out an action

start

e

gy

being in a tense state

edgy

egg

that I feel does not improve the quality of high

school

instruction in any country. Alternative

school

scheduling and teacher monitoring through video are much better approaches and will be analysed for viability in

this

essay.

Firstly

, modified

school

scheduling improves

education

in a way that openly c

ritiqu-

an essay or article that gives a critical evaluation (as of a book or play)

critique

i

ng

to or toward the inside of

in

teachers does not.

For example

, many Scandinavian

school

boards run

education

systems that take short, periodic w

eek-long

lasting through a week

weeklong

breaks throughout the academic year

instead

of one larger two-month break at summertime. Overall, students have just as much holiday time as their peers in traditional holiday arrangements, but there is not

such

a long,

education

-deterring break a

t

Suggestion

of

summer, and

this

allows students to mentally retain more of their studies.

This

arrangement is clearly a more plausible alternative to arguments supporting the open criticism of teachers on the internet.

In addition

to

this

, schools should consider videotaping classes to both monitor teacher performance and student conduct. I once taught at a

school

with

this

a

r-

a unit of surface area equal to 100 square meters

are

air

area

r

angement

the thing arranged or agreed to

arrangement

and found it made it much easier for students’ parents to stay a

ttune

Suggestion

attuned

to both their children’s lessons and conduct during class time.

Such

a system would

also

ensure all critiquing of the teacher is carried out by adults and not t

eenag-

being of the age 13 through 19

teenage

e

rs,

a vetting process that would likely produce more insightful criticism.

Thus

, the plausibility of

this

alternative is clear It can be concluded that both a

paced academic s

Suggestion

most effectively

chedule and class transparency would more effectively im

prove

a person who is professionally engaged in the analysis and interpretation of works of art

critic

charity

site

high

school

education

than the proposed online criti