Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby. Therefore , smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Medical Studies have shown that smoking is not only leads to

health

problems for the smoker, but

also

for people close by.

As a result

of

this

, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places.

Although

there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a

ban

is the most appropriate course of action. Opponents of

such

a

ban

argue against it for several reasons.

f

irstly

Suggestion

Firstly

,

Accept space

,

they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s

smoke

by going to places where it is allowed. i

f

Suggestion

If

they would prefer not to

smoke

passively,

then

they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted.

In addition

, they believe a

ban

would possibly drive many bans and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They

also

argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. s

moking

Suggestion

Smoking

is not against the law, So individuals should have the freedom to

smoke

where they wish.

H

owever there

Accept comma addition

However, there

are more convincing arguments in favour of a

ban

.

First

and foremost, it has been proven that tobacco consists of carcinogenic compounds which cause serious harm to a person’s

health

not only the smoker. Anyone around them can develop cancers of the lungs, mouth and throat, and other sites in the body.It is simply not fair to impose

this

upon another person. It is a

also

the case that people’s

health

is more important than businesses. In any case, pubs and restaurants could adapt a

ban

by,

for example

allowing smoking areas. In conclusion

,

Accept space

,

it is clear that it should be made illegal to

smoke

in public places.

This

would improve the

health

of thousands of people, and

that is

most definitely a positive development.