bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla blabla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla

Both the reading and the
lecture
were talking about the usage of the great houses and why did the
Chaco
Canyon built it. The reading suggests that there is three theories that can explain that.
However
the
lecture
disagree
Suggestion
disagrees
. The
lecture
states that none of these three theories are convincing.
First
, the reading states that the
Chaco
structure was purely residential. The
Chaco
's houses
looks
Suggestion
look
strikingly similar to the large well-known apartment buildings which many people have lived for centuries.
However
the
lecture
refutes. The
lecture
states that the
Chaco
structure was not used as a residential
apartments
Suggestion
apartment
.
Although
the
Chaco
outside structure looks like the native American houses, the inside is totally different and cause serious doubts. It is said to be built
for
being one more than three
four
hundred people, but the fire places to cook inside the houses are way less than hundred.
However there
Accept comma addition
However, there
is a hundred rooms
inside
Suggestion
in
the building, there is only ten fireplaces found. So
this
assumption
can not
can not
cannot
be true.
Second
, the
reading
Suggestion
reader
assumes that the
Chaco
buildings were used to store food supply. They have a huge supply of maize that needs to be stored somewhere, and the size of these buildings is suitable for the
storage
.
However
the
lecture
refuses. The
lecture
states that the Chacos buildings
can not
can not
cannot
be used for
storage
.
Although
it's
of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"
its
size is suitable for the
storage
, there
is
Suggestion
are
no traces of maize on the floor of the building.
Also there
Accept comma addition
Also, there
is
Suggestion
are
no
storage
containers found in the building. If the place were used for
storage
there must be evidence for that, like the ones they found in the other
storage
places.
Consequently
, it
can not
can not
cannot
be a
storage
space.
Third
, the reading states that the houses were used as ceremonial
centers
an area that is approximately central within some larger region
centres
Centers
. The archaeologists found an enormous pile of old material that contain
large number
Suggestion
a large number
of broken pots like the ones found in
Pueblo Alto house
Suggestion
the Pueblo Alto house
, which may be an evidence that people gathered there for special ceremonies.
However
the
lecture
disagrees. The
lecture
states that the building being used for ceremonial purposes is not supported. The archaeologists have
founds
Suggestion
found
many different
thing
Suggestion
things
in the house not only the broken pots like sand, stones and construction materials. If it was not removed during the construction, the pots might be the same, they are just trash. And it is completely different than the Pueblo Alto house, which contain many other ceremonial materials not just broken pots.
This
is why it
can not
can not
cannot
be used for ceremonial purposes.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: