Children education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some or all the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?

In the recent decades, the question of whether the

government

should pay for children has been receiving a great deal of public attention.

Although

this

assistance is not without the disadvantages, the upsides will be far more significant. On the one hand, there are a number of drawbacks of

this

sponsorship.

First

, since sustainable development of a country requires to have many investments in different fields, paying all cost for

education

of children can put more burden on the national budget. In fact, the

government

need to allocate funds for many key areas,

such

as the health care system and infrastructures, which means that every citizen should shoulder the responsibility to pay their children’s tuition and fee.

Second

, by supporting the cost of

education

for children from national treasure, the authorities could create unfairness to childless people.

This

means that they may feel angry or irritated if knowing that their taxes are not spent on their benefits.

On the other hand

, there are some advantages when

education

costs of children are backing up by

government

.

First

, in order to prepare for labour forces in the future, a country should invest more in

education

especially for the very young ages.

This

means that children who have strong

education

will become qualified employees later, which helps national economics develop by levelling productivity.

Second

, if the

government

supports children’s

education

, every child will have the chance to go to school and gain knowledge.

Therefore

, illiteracy and social crimes will be diminished, which bring the prosperity to the country. In conclusion,

although

the sponsorship for

education

of kids is not without disadvantage, the benefit was far more justified.