Some People believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Sports play a pivotal role in people's lives. A host of citizens holds the assumption that being a fruitful cricketer, footballer, one's inherent forte is prime.

However

, others believe that becoming accustomed to do diligence can lead someone to stand at the apex position of sports' career. I believe that strenuous tasks provide the summit position of sports world. There is a number of factors why some individuals claim congenital faculty is the principal job to be effectual in the sports career.

Firstly

, Sports

likewise

volleyball, badminton, hockey is

such

a game which can be obtained by inborn.

As a result

, if a person is futile to posses the prowess since birth, it is hardly feasible to have a fruition in games.

For instance

, in India, researchers demonstrated that nearly 23% boys were vain in a chess game because of lacking innate capability.

On the other hand

, for some, it is not mandatory to have special brilliance for the advent of a prominent

player

. They expound that to become a successful

player

, indefatigable work as well as exercise are the prerequisite.

Furthermore

, tireless assiduity will lead a

player

to discover some new strategies to surmount those obstacles which hinder him to be venerable athletic.

In addition

to it, routinely practice will be conducive to become a glaring

player

of his coach what will promote his position.

For example

, Sachin Tendulkar, former worldwide esteemed cricketer, was the most successful cricketer in the world as he practiced regularly, approximately 16 hours per day. To conclude, nature capability is a minimal fact to be a successful

player

compared with assiduous persistence. I believe that industrious perseverance can bring the fruitful sports career.