Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree. ?

It is argued that

face

to

face

interaction is more effective method to communicate as compared to emails, letters and messages. I agree to the aforesaid statement and below I will

first

explain how oral

communication

with the person sitting in front of you, provides

non verbal

being other than verbal communication

nonverbal

cues to the receiver, and

secondly

, how it create an opportunity for the participants to clarify any doubts.

Non verbal

Suggestion

Nonverbal

cues like expression, tone

,

Accept space

,

hand signals are an essential part of

communication

. These cues provide context to help in assigning

weightage

Suggestion

weights

weighted

to the message

.

Accept space

.

Moreover

, use of hand signals while communicating in front of each other help in overcoming any language limitations.

For example

, people when visiting

foreign place

Suggestion

a foreign place

where they are unaware of the local language often use hand signals to show what they mean. Doubts or misunderstandings are bound to happen in any

communication

, but

face

to

face

interaction provides a platform to clarify those doubts instantly by promoting two- way

communication

. As the person is sitting in front of you it is easy to ask questions and get answers

for

Suggestion

to

them without waiting for the response.

This

helps in increasing the speed of making decisions.

For example

, 80 percent of organizations reported that they use kickoff meeting

instead

of status

on

Suggestion

of

email for

there

of them or themselves

their

critical projects to save time and getting effective results. In conclusion, I believe that people should utilize every opportunity to employ

face

to

face

interaction in their

communication

so as to clearly state the purpose and

clarifythe

Suggestion

clarify the

context of their message.