There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than through continual assessment. What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment?

In the recent times, periodic examinations have become a preferred way to assess students compared to the regular assessments. While

this

may benefit in making students sincere and competitive, there are

also

some drawbacks to be considered.

Firstly

, one benefit is that exams bring a great

level

of sincerity in students to achieve success as they are often conducted in a formal set up and require thorough preparation. Having a sincere approach to study is the key to effective learning and growth.

Secondly

, as exams are standardized and organized at central

level

, it helps students compete directly with others.

This

prepares them for their future,

when as adults,

Suggestion

as adults, when

they will have to face a similar situation in the job market.

For example

, IT companies regularly conduct logic ability and written communication exams as a

first

level

of screening for fresh graduates prior to interviewing them. On the other side, one issue is that students do not get a chance to have a regular feedback and improve, which is only possible with continued assessment methods.

This

may deprive students a chance to incrementally improve and focus on their weak areas. Another problem is that exams bring a high

level

of stress in students without judging their key abilities, which leads to mental health issues in children. To illustrate, in a recent survey conducted by the ABC research among students from

grade 6th

Accept comma addition

grade, 6th

to 8th in the UK, 40% were stressed due to their examinations and had to seek medical advice. In conclusion, while exams can work as an effective way of assessment, it can

also

lead to lack of timely feedback and high stress among students.