As science and technology advance, humankind has witnessed countless feats in agriculture, most important of which include the advent of chemical
and equipment as it increased the
production and reduced the nutriment price
The
of compost and machines to increase
yields has become an integral aspect of farming. Yet some people condemn
a practice, citing concerns over their possible adverse ramifications on human
and the welfare of society. In my personal perspective, I believe that
and operators will remain beneficial to farmers, provided that they are used on a moderate
.
There is no denying that composts and apparatus have served a vital role in securing a stable source of nutrient for human.
, the yield of a
is under the influence of many elements, weather conditions, soil compositions, pests or natural disasters, where
can prove helpful in enhancing
resistance to external disturbances.
Despite the discussion above, excessive utilize of
has always gone under fire by scientists due to their deleterious impacts. Empirical evidence and academic research have proved that the deterioration of land fertility is often a result of the overuse of plant
. Other consequences include poisoning all wildlife feeding on
crops,
as birds, and polluting the neighbouring water bodies. In regards to human
and safety standards
can cause lethal
poisoning in consumers lacking care in cleaning and preparing their meals.
, according to the recent statistic, the more people
fertilizes to grow the sustenance, the more individuals suffer cancer.
, many babies were born with disabilities that might be due to the diet of their parents, particularly, the quality of nourishment.
In conclusion on the
of the aforementioned arguments, people are convinced that a sustainable supply of
still rests on fertilisers and machinery, and the key is to
them properly and in moderation.As science and technology advance, humankind has witnessed countless feats in agriculture, most important of which include the advent of chemical
and equipment The
of compost and machines to increase
yields has become an integral aspect of farming. Yet some people condemn
a practice, citing concerns over their possible adverse ramifications on human
and the welfare of society. In my personal perspective, I believe that
and operators will remain beneficial to farmers, provided that they are used on a moderate
.
There is no denying that composts and apparatus have served a vital role in securing a stable source of nutrient for human.
: Urea is a
that contains large amounts of nitrogen, which is essential for healthy plant growth. Undoubtedly, machines are used widely in agriculture in
day and age, liberating farmers from menial labour and tremendously boosting productivity.
, the yield of a
is under the influence of many elements, weather conditions, soil compositions, pests or natural disasters, where
can prove helpful in enhancing
resistance to external disturbances.
Despite the discussion above, excessive utilize of
has always gone under fire by scientists due to their deleterious impacts. Empirical evidence and academic research have proved that the deterioration of land fertility is often a result of the overuse of plant
. Other consequences include poisoning all wildlife feeding on
crops,
as birds, and polluting the neighbouring water bodies. In regards to human
and safety standards,
can cause lethal
poisoning in consumers lacking care in cleaning and preparing their meals.
, according to the recent statistic, the more people
fertilizes to grow the sustenance, the more individuals suffer cancer.
, many babies were born with disabilities that might be due to the diet of their parents, particularly, the quality of nourishment.
In conclusion on the
of the aforementioned arguments, people are convinced that a sustainable supply of
still rests on fertilisers and machinery, and the key is to
them properly and in moderation.