Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Each nation has its own living standards which are changing with time. People from the same nation living in the same country but in different ages have different cultures and living standards, which can be reflected in the old historical buildings, owned by the government and are declared as national assets. The government has a department responsible for the

protection

of these cultural and historical symbols. Normally

such

spots are situated in the mid cities and in well populated areas, where there is no available land for the new construction and some of the society members or on the view that these buildings must be demolished and new facilities must be constructed. While the other considers it as part of their

history

and are standing for its

protection

. A debate always goes on its

protection

and there are different organizations which are working to enhance the public awareness regarding the

protection

of these national assets. It is important to protect it, as it’s a symbol of our

history

. Now, the point of consideration is that either a

history

should be a barrier in moving ahead? Of course no, but the thing that we need to understand is that

either

Suggestion

this is either the

this

is the only option to progress or we have alternate options available. For sure we need to find alternate ways to make progress and protecting our

history

as

Suggestion

at

the same time.

For example

, a metro service is a major mean of mass transportation and is facilitating most of the residents in the city. I have seen examples in Qatar and Pakistan, where it has to be passed

from

Suggestion

since

the mid of the city, including the historical national buildings, and the governments have constructed the underground metro through advanced technology by bearing additional costs, just to protect its

history

. In my point of

view historical

Accept comma addition

view, historical

buildings must be protected unless we have no option left.