Many old buildings protected by law are part of nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Each nation has its own living standards which are changing with time. People from the same nation living in the same country but in different ages have different cultures and living standards, which can be reflected in the old historical buildings, owned by the government and are declared as national assets. The government has a department responsible for the
protection
of these cultural and historical symbols. Normally
such
spots are situated in the mid cities and in well populated areas, where there is no available land for the new construction and some of the society members or on the view that these buildings must be demolished and new facilities must be constructed. While the other considers it as part of their
history
and are standing for its
protection
. A debate always goes on its
protection
and there are different organizations which are working to enhance the public awareness regarding the
protection
of these national assets. It is important to protect it, as it’s a symbol of our
history
. Now, the point of consideration is that either a
history
should be a barrier in moving ahead? Of course no, but the thing that we need to understand is that
either
Suggestion
this is either the
this
is the only option to progress or we have alternate options available. For sure we need to find alternate ways to make progress and protecting our
history
as
Suggestion
at
the same time.
For example
, a metro service is a major mean of mass transportation and is facilitating most of the residents in the city. I have seen examples in Qatar and Pakistan, where it has to be passed
from
Suggestion
since
the mid of the city, including the historical national buildings, and the governments have constructed the underground metro through advanced technology by bearing additional costs, just to protect its
history
. In my point of
view historical
Accept comma addition
view, historical
buildings must be protected unless we have no option left.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users