The prevention of health problems is more important than treatment.Government funding should reflect that. Do you agree or disagree?

To address the importance of each part of dealing with

health

problems, I am going to

first

review both parts and

then

express my opinion.

Also

the financial perspective, especially the

government

funding of each part will be reviewed in

this

essay. As mentioned above, dealing with

health

problems has two main sides, taking necessary precautions before the

occurance

an event that happens

occurrence

of the

problem

and the

treatment

afterwards. From the

perpsective

a way of regarding situations or topics etc.

perspective

perspectives

of the involved individual, preventing the

health

problem

is usually much easier and more

preferrable

more desirable than another

preferable

preferably

, since the person is not suffering from the

problem

yet it may save them a lot of pain. There is a wide range of

health

problems and the way to prevent each type (if even possible) varies a lot.

For

example preventing

Accept comma addition

example, preventing

bacterial diseases is very different than preventing cancer, while the mental problems are a whole different story.

Also

, some problems cannot be prevented at all,

such

as birth defects (

however some

Accept comma addition

however, some

of them can be prevented if diagnosed before birth and soon enough) and disabilities like paraplegia, and some can be prevented but it is virtually impossible to do so and usually systematic actions to prevent them do not exist.

For

example one

Accept comma addition

example, one

can not

can not

cannot

prevent PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) because there is no systematic way of doing that, other than advising potential patients (

such

as soldiers or people with the background of mental disorders) to take some actions to minimize the risk.

Although

some types of

health

problems can be prevented and with a high success rate,

for example

controlling diseases

such

as pox through

vaccination

. From the financial perspective, it is

also

preferrable

more desirable than another

preferable

to prevent the

problem

as in most cases the cost of

treatment

is significantly higher than prevent the

problem

. For the diseases that can be prevented through

vaccination it

Accept comma addition

vaccination, it

is usually a no brainer to vaccinate. Apart from the damage of having the disease, the

vaccination

cost is usually very low. Depending on the

health

problem

, it is usually better for the

government

to take the funding of

health

problem

prevention into consideration.

Firstly

,

government

supported

health-care

the preservation of mental and physical health by preventing or treating illness through services offered by the health profession

healthcare

programs may have to spend a lot of their budget to cover the

treatment

of high-cost patients, so if they can be prevented the budget can be saved to better support more low-cost patients.

Secondly

, most of the controlled diseases which can be prevented with

vaccination

are contagious and their outbreak would be a serious

problem

to

Suggestion

for

the public

health

.

Consequently

, though some problems

such

as

cancer which

Accept comma addition

cancer, which

is very costly to treat, cannot be prevented to easily, but the

government

can fund several sections to help with that,

such

as research facilities to help finding better solutions to treat or even to cure some cases and the media to raise awareness of the problems as some types of cancer could be treated way more easily if diagnosed in early stages. To conclude, I think in general the prevention of

health

problems is less costly and less painful,

thus

more important to take into consideration, especially by the

government

.

However we

Accept comma addition

However, we

cannot simply ignore the

treatment

section since we cannot prevent all of the problems.