It is crucial for many companies to ensure
one
's fitness for a job before accepting him. Some people believe that interviews are not favourable for Use synonyms
this
, while others think that they are the best option. Linking Words
This
essay will argue why interviews are not as precise and effective and suggest other means to estimate whether a candidate suites for a position.
Linking Words
To begin
with, interviews are the most common way to accept someone for a position for a number of reasons, including fast assessment of professional skills and ability to express them in a stressful situation like an interview. The argument goes, that if a person cannot leave a good impression straight away, he would not likely to meet job criteria in future. Linking Words
For instance
, when a doctor, who apply for a job, fails to perform a simple procedure, it usually means he is not qualified enough for a position. Linking Words
Thus
, interviews are claimed to access Linking Words
one
's fitness for work fast and efficiently.
Use synonyms
Conversely
, there is Linking Words
one
substantial drawback in interviews which makes them less precise. They usually do not consider the human factor which is present in many applicants in a day of assessment. To illustrate, the candidate's results may be affected by his stress, and interviewers might make wrong conclusions regarding his professional skills. Use synonyms
Therefore
, for a better accuracy there should be a period of probation, when an employee has a chance to show his fitness to a post. Linking Words
This
way, the human factor is less likely to influence his results.
To conclude, ensuring Linking Words
one
's suitability is vital for employers, Use synonyms
although
, despite advantages interviews possess, they are not the best way for Linking Words
this
. The more precise and effective method, in my opinion, is probation, since human factor is likely to be excluded.Linking Words
harooooosh