Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that scientific research should be monitored by state

instead

Linking Words

of

corporation

Suggestion

corporate

sectors. I agree with

this

Linking Words

statement and believe that it should be supported financially and supervised accurately by the governments.

To begin

Linking Words

with, it is usually difficult for the private companies to compete with states in terms of

financial budget

Suggestion

financial budgets

the financial budget

. Governments have to allocate resources to many areas of public spending, one of which is scientific

researchs

systematic investigation to establish facts

research

.

As a result

Linking Words

of

such

Linking Words

an economic support, scientific projects which are performed by governments will rarely

facing

Suggestion

face

money shortages.

For instance

Linking Words

, nuclear agencies which are funded by states usually proceed their

researchs

systematic investigation to establish facts

research

more quickly. Corporation sectors,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, usually have to struggle with financial matters which greatly affected their productivity. Another advantage of monitoring by states is that scientific researches are likely to be more valid and accurate. From a quality perspective, corporations which carry

this

Linking Words

out may be tempted to manipulate results in order to maximize profits.

For example

Linking Words

, currently it has been clear that a famous milk powder company in Iran, distributed expired products which led to numerous infant diseases.

As a result

Linking Words

, strict controlling on the project by governments deter researchers from irresponsibility. In conclusion, I agree strongly with the view that governments should carry the responsibility of controlling research.

and

Suggestion

And

it should be funded and supervised by the state.