Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is argued that there is a tendency for people to spend time and

money

on themselves rather than that

money

spent on the protection of wild animals. I completely disagree with

this

idea, and

this

essay will argue about allocating resources for both animals and human population.

Firstly

, the government and citizens play a vital role in protecting wild animals. Obviously, wild animals are now on the verge of extinction, and the responsibility to protect wild animals fall upon the people. Wildlife extinction results in an ecological crisis.

Moreover

, it

also

affects human survival.

For example

, wild animals bring in a great deal of advantage in the medical industry,

such

as service for producing types of medicine. People and animal have a strong relationship together;

therefore

, when people spend

money

and time to protect wild animal

species

mean improving the habitats in which they live.

Secondly

, wild animals

also

have great aesthetic and socio-cultural values, and they contribute to our rich bio-diversity that makes

this

planet a beautiful place.

For example

, Safari Phu Quoc is type of business, but it is

also

place help to reserve wild animals.

Furthermore

, thanks to

this

tourism creates jobs for local citizens. In order to maintain wild animal protection, we must take steps to rectify mass animal extinction.

In addition

, in the natural the environment, animal

species

are connected;

thus

, if one

species

becomes extinct, it will lead to many other

species

to duffer as the food chain id disrupted. In conclusion, we need to protect wildlife because

this

will help us to protect, too. Wild animals bring various benefits, so we spend

money

and time to protection of wild animal is extreme necessity.