Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Increasing the rate of criminals has been a big problem for countries in recent decades. One side thinks that punishments ought to be enacted standard laws for each kind of crime, whereas others believe that it should be assessed in terms of several factors

such

as their motivation and the situation. Some experts would like to see the rules of the punishment which are the same for everyone. They suggest that it is fairer because

this

is a sensitive subject.

In other words

, if norms do not have flexible, the community will trust the authorities.

For example

, there are several crimes that we were exposed to see on the television or newspapers. Offenders could not be faced the equal results for punishment. Thereby,

this

does not make sense for supporters of

this

argument. Another view,

however

, suggests that circumstances and other reasons are so important for it. There are lots of examples of

this

argument.

For instance

, as

citizens need

Accept comma addition

citizens, need

to protect themselves, they may attack others. Thereby, their punishment should be taken by considering

this

situation. In conclusion, to my mind, laws are crucial not only for

fair but

Accept comma addition

fair, but

also

for peace in the countries, so it can be taken by counting circumstances. Because of the fact that there are lots of life and places. The crime can change

for

Suggestion

in

this

area and it relies on individuals. I believe nations should find a way

that is

fair at for almost anyone.