The government’s investment in arts, music and theater is a waste of money. Government should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

There is a claim that investing state budget in arts, music and
theater
a building where theatrical performances or motion-picture shows can be presented
theatre
is
Suggestion
are
a waste of money,
thus
instead
, it should be used for public services. Even though I agree that public services are more crucial, governments should set aside a budget for development of the art and culture sector. The art and culture sectors do not really help to solve major issues for societies, especially in the level of national economics. With
this
in mind, the state budget should be used for upgrading public service
such
as healthcare, education or infrastructure. An improved public service can enhance the overall quality of life and it is vitally important for their well-being.
For instance
, it is possible to live without going to the
theater
a building where theatrical performances or motion-picture shows can be presented
theatre
for
recreation but
Accept comma addition
recreation, but
the absence of health care services will create serious problems.
This
is a reason why governments should consider public service investment as a priority sector.
On the other hand
, investing in arts, music and
theater
a building where theatrical performances or motion-picture shows can be presented
theatre
cannot be considered a total waste of money, because they are a part of culture and society which can be carried from
generation
to
generation
. Arts are not just depictions of paintings or
crafts but
Accept comma addition
crafts, but
are
also
represented by architecture, traditional performances and clothing. Apart from their intrinsic value to a society, they can
also
be a useful source of income
generation
, particularly in relation to tourism.
For example
, a public museum can display valuable sculptures or can show historical documentary films for young
generation
to learn about history, at the same time it can
also
generate money from cultural tourism. For these reasons, governments should continue to support the arts with public funding. In conclusion, government should consider public services as the main investment priory and spend a major portion of the funds to upgrade public services.
However
, arts, music and
theater
a building where theatrical performances or motion-picture shows can be presented
theatre
should
also
receive financial support because both of them play important roles in different aspects.
Submitted by anisasoul on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Intrinsic value
  • Cultural heritage
  • National identity
  • Economic impact
  • Tourism attraction
  • Social cohesion
  • Public services
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Infrastructure
  • Robust
  • Catalyst
  • Private sector sponsorship
  • Preserving
  • Boosting
  • Enhancing
  • Fundamental
  • Necessity
  • Balancing
  • Investment
What to do next:
Look at other essays: