smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the wprld today. In the interest of the public health, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products. Do you agree or disagree?

Smoking has a detrimental effect on

health

, and all around the world consuming all tobacco products is a major issue for the public

health

. Some people think that the governments should restrict or ban them. I will discuss drawback and positive effect of banning smoking in

this

essay in my perspective. Clearly, to take care of the public

health

is a significant duty for the governments. One of the crucial problems is smoking, especially indoor consuming. It causes some death diseases

such

as breathing problems and other respiratory illnesses, even if lung cancer. It is believed that it is not only personal restriction,

also

the governments banning is necessary for decreasing consuming tobacco products.

For instance

, in a survey which has been done at a local university in Turkey, in the years 1980 between 2000, only 5 percent consuming cigarette had decreased important rate of respiratory illness among 1000 people.

That is

to say, if the illnesses wan to decline, the number of smokers is decreasing, too.

On the other hand

, some people believe that banned something is effected harmful to individuals. They insist everyone is responsible only their

health

.

That is

accurate in a way, but nobody should not affect the others. When a person smoke, all people are in there suffered with detrimental chemicals which in the cigarette, doubtless. Meanwhile, the governments should educate the people have that mentality to care about

health

issues are caused by smoking. In conclusion,

although

restricting smoking can not affect public

health

. The government should educate the people be aware both heath themselves and others in order to ban smoking indoors, even if be restricted sales.