Some people feel that the exploration of space justifies a large amount of government and private investment. Other people think that this field is of increasingly low relevance, and should not be a priority. Debate both sides of this discussion, and explain your own view. How important is it for us to explore space at the moment?

Space

exploration is a subject which provokes great emotions

as well as

scientific interest, and at times the two become somewhat blurred. There are strong arguments on both sides of the debate about whether to continue

space

travel, which we will discuss here. On the one hand, those who urge the continued exploration of

space

say that

this

field has given us substantial technical advances over the past fifty years, ranging from better plastics and 22alloys to a greater understanding of flight and gravity.

Furthermore

, they claim that

further

investigations will help to solve some of mankind’s most pressing issues,

such

as lack of food and environmental damage

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because the study of (

for example

) biology and chemistry can be carried out more radically in

space

. Recent experiments on the International

Space

Station in the field of genetics certainly seem to support

this

view.

Conversely

,

however

, people who oppose more funding for

space

research point to the extremely high costs involved, compared to the practical benefits which are gained for almost all members of the human race.

For example

, these opponents state that all the major developments in terms of medicine, genetics, materials and mechanics have actually been

as

Change preposition

apply

show examples

a result of terrestrial science and experiments, rather than stemming from

space

exploration.

Moreover

, they feel that

space

investigation is largely an academic pursuit, fascinating though it is, and that at a time of

austerity

Add a comma

austerity,

show examples

our funding should be directed to more practical programmes to help people. It is indeed true that addressing some major human challenges

such

as pollution control, protection of wildlife and greater political stability would not require any involvement at all by

space

scientists.

Overall

, I feel that the opponents of high funding for

space

have the stronger argument at present. It seems that the enormous sums involved could be used more practically to deal with some of our most immediate problems. After all,

space

will always be there to explore, when funding and other problems make its research more affordable for us as a species.