Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged for use by some countries. To what extent is this a positive or negative development?

The

energy

, which is produced by wind and solar, is more beneficial and less harmful as compare to the power, which is produced by coal, oil and gas. There

are

several reasons to proof that,

this

is positive development rather than negative development.

For example

, carbon emission is the main drawback of the coals, oil and gas. The

energy

is our necessity to deal with our daily household activities;

therefore

, it should be cheap and easily accessible. Yet, a rich natural resource country can make the

energy

cheaply with these minerals, but she has to bear the cost of air and other pollutions.

Moreover

, these

are

not renewable and can be used for once.

For example

, if these resources

are

vanished from the earth,

then

our new generation cannot use it in the future, which will make

this

energy

source more expensive. On the other side of the picture, wind and solar

are

sustainable sources of the

energy

production and these

are

not harmful for the environment.

Thus

, these

are

useful for everyone. To get

energy

from air, solar and water dam, government or individual need to bear expense just for once, after that they can enjoy the fruit in their whole life.

Moreover

, these

are

renewable resources, but there is a problem that gust and solar setup can only be established at the suitable places. To sum up the arguments, breeze and solar

are

suitable according to the weather conditions of the places, but these

are

more acceptable resources as compared to others, because these do not create the any type of pollution in the environment.