Many people in society believe that having fixed punishments for all crimes is a more efficient way of dealing with criminals in the justice system. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment?

In recent times, there has been a steady increase in the

crime

rate all over the world and with

this

many assert that there must be a pre-decided

verdict

for all sorts of

crime

.

This

essay will shed some light on the pros and cons of having fixed punishments in any judicial system.

Firstly

, the major advantage is that every individual would be infused with a constant feeling of fear in their hearts. Thinking and planning about committing a

crime

could get disrupted as the doers would be fully aware of the consequences which will come forth in the form of a severe

punishment

decided beforehand.

For instance

, in Dubai, the monarch deals with theft cases equally by striking off the arms of the thief.

This

has instilled a great terror among the citizens which

demotivate

them to get involved in any

such

activity.

Thus

, it is crucial to get the thinking of people in the right direction using fear as a tool. Another big advantage could be that the verdicts would be un-biased. Any sort of

crime

committed would be dealt in the same manner as in the case of any other.

Moreover

, it would

also

lead to fast tracked cases as the jury will not require much time to analyse and interpret the findings and the evidences to be able to give out the

verdict

. To cite an example, Dubai deals with all crimes against women by taking the convicted to a place called ‘the chop chop square’

also

known as Al-Dera Chowk where the public gathers and throw stones and pebbles on the criminal and

thus

, taking his life.

Therefore

, fixed

punishment

would enable un-biased and fast paced court

cases making

Accept comma addition

cases, making

the judicial system much effective and efficient.

On the other hand

, one of the disadvantages could be injustice delivered to the suspected people. Whenever anyone commits a

crime

, they do have a fair idea of what kind of

punishment

would be given keeping in mind the type of

crime

they have done. Say, person A commits a robbery and person B commits a murder,

both

of which are crimes but of a different nature and intensity. The ideal

verdict

could be a six

months

Suggestion

month

jail sentence and life imprisonment for

both

respectively but

Accept comma addition

respectively, but

having a fixed

punishment

for

both

would lead to an unjust

verdict

as

both

the crimes cannot be compared to one another.

Hence

, setting a fixed sentence could be a medium to deliver injustice to people and their families. To sum up, the advantages clearly outweigh the disadvantages and

thus

, it will be

yield

Suggestion

yielding

a great benefit if there is a fixed

punishment

for all types of crimes bringing the

crime

rate down to zero.