It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Teaching
history
for schoolchildren has been a heated topic constant. There is a common belief that local
history
is more important to children than
world
history
.
However
, I disagree with
this
belief. I believe the notion that local
history
is more valuable than
world
history
should be rejected. Some people may claim that the insights into the local historical values are complete enough for one to live. Their claim could be true a few decades ago when most interpersonal communications were between people of the same race and origin.
However
,
this
view is now outdated, as the
world
has become globalised and international business and migrant workers have made any community a global village. In
this
context, an understanding of a foreign country’s
history
would enable future local workers to reinforce the relationship between them and the expatriates from that country.
In addition
, I am strongly convinced that children would benefit the most only when the learning of local
history
is placed parallel to that of
world
history
. To understand a local historical event, children should put the regional and sometimes even
world
context of that historical era into consideration.
For example
, children should acknowledge that the event that Vietnam regained its independence after defeating the Japanese troops in Indochina in 1945 only happened after a series of relevant events in the
World
War II, one of which is the surrender of Japan to the Allies. In
this
way of learning, children would understand
history
more deeply and thoroughly. All the existing data have provided a concrete foundation that the study of local
history
should always be parallel to that of
world
history
.
This
practice would guarantee that children learn
history
more comprehensively and be able to tighten the bond with migrant workers in their country.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users