◼️Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Instead
of being conducted by private companies, important scientific investigation must be managed and administered by the governments, according to the opinions of many. I personally believe that private companies should be given their own freedom in doing inquiry, but with sufficient and proper monitoring from the government. On one hand, it is true that scientific inquiry should not be only conducted by the government. The main reason is that the scope of scientific probe is diverse and wide, and private companies could cover up some inquiry which is not carried out by the governments. Many private institutions or individuals' discoveries are useful for the humanity, as we can learn from the past.
For example
, Thomas Alva Edison was an individual inventor who has greatly contributed to the world with his inventions
such
as the light bulb,m
Accept space
,
o
tion pictures, phonograph and so on. We should notice that the invention was not the main focus of the government’s analysis during that time, and thanks to Edison we have electric light today.
On the other hand
,
although
private companies give the right to do scientific probe, they must be strictly monitored by the governments. They must be controlled, as some of them might be doing it for their monetary gain or for destructive weapons.
For example
, some companies might focus on developing biochemical weapons, and it could threaten the world peace. It is the governments’ job to prevent and block these kinds of exploration. In conclusion, I do not agree that scientific analysis should only be conducted by the governments. It is a fact that the scope of scientific examination is huge.
Therefore
, privateers should be allowed in doing analysis.
However
, I do agree to the examination
that is
done by private companies must be reviewed, and monitored by the governments in order to avoid any misappropriation.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users