Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children grow up with wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree whit this option?

A

child

that lives his youth in a poor family can better face the obstacles of adult

life

than a

child

raised up in a rich family contest. In my opinion,

this

is not completely true, since I believe that the ability to manage problems depends not only on the economic status of the family during the childhood, but more on the family support. Surely childhood is one of the most important periods of

life

. It is in these years that the

child

starts to give a shape to his world. He goes to school, he learns things, he understands the dynamics of staying together. Living into the richness could lead the baby to a wrong vision of the rules that menage the world. Something

that is

not possible to happen to someone brought up in a poor contest, in fact

,

Accept space

,

there

Suggestion

they're

the reality of facts is something that cannot be hidden.

Therefore

, I am convinced that the family, precisely the parents, plays a fundamental role in the growth of the

child

and in his future behaviour. Since the

child

is used to copy the actions of the older people around him, the way his mum and dad act will be important to define his future attitude. Even if the family is rich, but the parents understand how to train their kid, he will have the same ability to deal with the unknown facts of adult

life

as a poor

child

. In conclusion, the important thing, to be able not to give up in adult

life

, is not about the money the family has, but the way the family stands by the

child

during his

first

stage of

life

.